FCA Tightens Grip on Crypto with UK Presence Rules

FCA Tightens Grip on Crypto with UK Presence Rules
Table of contents

    The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has moved to aggressively regulate the cryptocurrency sector by extending its flagship Consumer Duty to cryptoasset activities. In a decisive step detailed in Consultation Paper 26/4 (CP26/4), the regulator outlined a comprehensive framework that forces crypto firms to adhere to the same high standards of transparency and fairness required of traditional financial institutions. The proposal includes a strict requirement for overseas companies to establish a legal entity within the UK if they wish to serve British customers.

    This latest consultation marks a pivotal moment in the UK’s strategy to integrate cryptoassets into its regulated financial ecosystem. By applying the Consumer Duty, the FCA is signaling that the era of “buyer beware” in crypto is ending. Firms will now be legally obligated to act in good faith, avoid causing foreseeable harm, and support retail customers in achieving their financial objectives. This means crypto companies must prove that their products offer fair value and that their marketing communications are clear, ensuring consumers fully understand the risks involved before investing.

    A central pillar of the new regime is the enhancement of consumer redress mechanisms. Under the proposed rules, the FCA will extend the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service to cover the crypto sector. This change empowers consumers to escalate complaints to an independent body if they are dissatisfied with a firm’s response to a dispute. However, the regulator stopped short of offering a full safety net. The consultation explicitly states that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) will not cover cryptoasset activities. Consequently, investors will not be entitled to government-backed compensation if a crypto firm collapses, highlighting the continued high-risk nature of the asset class.

    The Regulatory Pile of Challenges Keeps Getting Higher for Crypto

    Safeguarding customer assets is another critical focus of CP26/4. The FCA intends to apply strict custody rules, specifically referencing CASS 17 for crypto assets and CASS 7 for client money. These regulations mandate that firms must segregate client funds from their own operational capital, holding them in trust to protect users in the event of insolvency. While the regulator is allowing some flexibility for co-mingling assets to facilitate activities like staking, this will be subject to rigorous guardrails and disclosure requirements.

    The consultation also introduces significant operational hurdles for international players. The FCA’s baseline expectation is that overseas firms targeting the UK market must incorporate a local legal entity. This requirement aims to ensure effective supervision and accountability, preventing offshore platforms from evading UK conduct rules. Additionally, the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) will apply to these firms, holding individual executives personally accountable for conduct failures and ensuring that decision-makers possess the necessary competence and integrity.

    Interested parties have until March 12, 2026, to provide feedback on the proposals. The FCA plans to open the authorisation gateway in September 2026, with the full regime expected to go live in October 2027. This timeline gives firms a narrow window to overhaul their compliance structures or risk being shut out of the UK market entirely.

    Regulation
    The Monthly Register – Crypto Licensing in July 2026
    18 firms were added to the MiCA register in July across 11 European jurisdictions, with Germany taking six and Bulgaria and Liechtenstein two each. Entries reach the register through both of MiCA’s routes, authorization and notification. Five of Germany’s six are cooperative banks recorded with one permitted service, the execution of client orders, with no […]...
    2 weeks ago
    CryptoRegulation
    Crypto Divorce: Irreconcilable Differences, Irreversible Transactions
    No jurisdiction covered here has built a crypto-specific divorce regime, so classification runs on the same acquisition, source-of-funds and commingling rules that govern brokerage accounts and inherited land. The valuation date does most of the damage. Florida allows different assets to be valued on different dates, Ontario locks the number at separation regardless of what […]...
    2 weeks ago
    Regulation
    How Japan Regulates Crypto: The Old Rules Still Run
    Japan enacted its FIEA reform on 15 July 2026, but the crypto provisions have not commenced, so the Payment Services Act framework from 2017 is still the live rulebook, with the securities-law regime expected to bite around 2027. Custody is the strictest part of the current regime and survives the shift: at least 95% of […]...
    2 weeks ago