New Zealand Marketplace

New Zealand

New Zealand has no bespoke crypto license, which is either the attraction or the catch depending on what you are trying to build. A business dealing in crypto registers on the Financial Service Providers Register under the 2008 Act, falls under the AML/CFT Act with the Department of Internal Affairs as supervisor, and joins an approved dispute resolution scheme if it serves retail clients. Registration takes roughly 20 to 24 weeks on its own and six to nine months end to end, against government fees of around NZD 1,050, so the cost sits in the compliance build and the banking rather than the filings. But the tolerance for hollow registrations has changed. The Registrar can decline or remove a provider whose registration creates a misleading impression that the business is licensed or supervised in New Zealand, and the FMA has been willing to direct it, which is why the substance requirements read the way they do, meaning a physical office in New Zealand, at least one resident director, staff on the ground, and real operations. Buying an existing FSP compresses the calendar and inherits the file, so the diligence sits on whether the registered service categories cover your model, whether the AML program has survived an audit, and whether the dispute resolution membership and banking come across with the shares.

REGULATOR VALIDATED LOCAL EXPERTISE END-TO-END SUPPORT

Publish Your Offer With Us

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Do you need a license for crypto in New Zealand? +

There is no dedicated crypto license. A crypto business registers as a financial service provider on the FSPR, complies with the AML/CFT Act under Department of Internal Affairs supervision, and joins a dispute resolution scheme if it deals with retail clients. An FMA market services license only comes in where the product itself is a regulated financial product.

What does FSP registration cover? +

It records which financial services a business is permitted to hold itself out as providing, such as changing foreign currency, value transfer, or operating a value transfer service, which is where most crypto exchange activity lands. The registered categories matter, because the register is not a general permission.

Who supervises crypto businesses for AML in New Zealand? +

The Department of Internal Affairs supervises most virtual asset service providers as reporting entities under the AML/CFT Act 2009, which brings customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting, an annual report, and a biennial independent audit.

Do you need a New Zealand resident director? +

Yes. A New Zealand company needs at least one director who lives in New Zealand, or who lives in Australia and also sits on the board of an Australian company, and FSP registration goes further by expecting a physical office, at least one local employee, and genuine operations in the country. Registered agent addresses do not satisfy it.

How long does FSP registration take? +

Roughly 20 to 24 weeks for the registration itself, and six to nine months from incorporation to operating once you add the AML program, the dispute resolution scheme, and bank onboarding. Government fees are modest, around NZD 1,050 in total.

Can the Registrar remove an FSP from the register? +

Yes, and it does. Where a registration would give a false or misleading impression that the business is licensed or regulated in New Zealand, or where there is no genuine New Zealand connection, the Registrar can decline or deregister, and the FMA can direct it to act.

Does the registration transfer when you buy the company? +

The registration attaches to the company, so a share sale keeps it, with the Registrar notified of the change in directors and controllers. The dispute resolution scheme membership and the AML program need reviewing at the same time, since both are tied to the people running the business.

What should you check before buying a New Zealand FSP? +

The registered service categories against your intended model, whether the DIA has ever raised findings, whether the AML program has been through an independent audit and what it said, whether the dispute resolution scheme membership is current, and whether the local office and resident director arrangements continue after completion.