Buy a Licensed Company 
Explore VASP Data 
Talk to an Expert 
Why P2P Platforms Are Gaining Ground Again
Interest in buying crypto without verification comes in waves – and almost always right after another data leak. The pattern is familiar: an exchange reports a breach, a database of names, addresses and passport photos surfaces online, and within a couple of weeks platforms that never ask for documents see a noticeable surge in activity.
Behind this sits a problem the crypto industry still hasn’t solved. Identity verification creates exactly the databases that later get hacked. The stricter the rules, the more such databases exist – and the more expensive every failure to protect them becomes.
A Different Approach
P2P platforms approach the question from the other end: not protecting the database better, but not collecting it at all.
The clearest example is Bisq, running since 2016. It isn’t a website but open-source software you run on your own computer. Once launched, your machine becomes a node on the network and connects directly to other participants, by default through the Tor network. A detailed breakdown – from first launch to fees – is available at bisq.info.
There’s no registration here, and not because the developers decided to be generous. There’s none because there’s nowhere to register: no server with user accounts exists. The distinction matters. A promise not to store data can be broken one day. The absence of anywhere to store it cannot.
The legal side is built the same way. Bisq isn’t a company but a community-governed project. Which means there’s no firm anyone can order to freeze your money.
How a Trade Works
A seller posts an offer – say, 0.05 BTC for euros via bank transfer. A buyer accepts it, and both sides lock up a deposit. The buyer then sends money directly to the seller – by bank, through Revolut, in cash, dozens of options exist. The seller confirms the money arrived, and the bitcoin along with both deposits is released.
Money never passes through the platform itself. Funds sit at an address that opens only with two signatures – the buyer’s and the seller’s. If a dispute arises, a mediator steps in: they review the payment confirmations and propose a resolution that both sides sign. If no agreement is reached, there’s a fallback arbitration process.
The most interesting part here is the deposit. Both sides have their own money at risk, and abandoning a trade halfway is expensive. Cheating simply stops being worth it – before anyone’s intervention is even needed. The trust problem was solved not through oversight but through plain arithmetic.
What It Costs You
The picture would be incomplete without the downsides, and they’re substantial.
Fees are higher than on exchanges – roughly 0.15% for whoever posts the offer and 1.15% for whoever takes it. Paying in BSQ, the internal token, cuts that roughly in half, but it’s still noticeable. That’s the price of nobody holding your coins.
There aren’t many offers. Popular pairs fill quickly; less common payment methods can sit unanswered for hours.
Everything moves slowly. On the other end is a real person who has to open their banking app and make the transfer themselves. For active trading this doesn’t work at all.
You’re responsible for your own security. Wallet backups, storing your seed phrase, keeping the software updated. There’s no support desk that will restore access over the phone.
Taxes don’t disappear. Trading without ID checks is legal in most countries, but that doesn’t remove your obligation to pay taxes. These two things get confused surprisingly often.
Worth adding that in the newer Bisq 2, for smaller trades – roughly up to $600 – the deposit and fees were removed entirely, replaced by seller reputation. The deposit was previously what put off newcomers most.
Who Else Is Out There
Bisq isn’t alone. RoboSats works over Lightning, Hodl Hodl uses a different deposit arrangement, Peach is built for phones. Each one balances speed, number of offers, and how much the parties have to trust each other differently.
What sets Bisq apart is how long it has run. Nearly ten years – with no central point anyone could shut down, no theft of user funds by the platform, and no owner able to change the rules single-handedly. In a sector where projects last about three years, that counts for something on its own.
What Comes Next
Financial oversight will only tighten – there’s no reason to expect otherwise. But every set of rules has a price. And when that price becomes another leak of your documents, some people start looking for other options. Not criminals, not the paranoid – ordinary users who simply did the math on the risks.
These platforms probably won’t become mass-market products. They’re slower, more expensive, and require figuring things out. But they do their job honestly: exchanging bitcoin for money without a middleman holding both your coins and your passport at once. For the people who genuinely need that, there aren’t many working alternatives left with this kind of track record.
